As we travel deeper into the 21st century, there’s a noisy segment of society that is quick to jump in everyone’s face, relentlessly calling for social justice, economic equality, and fashion tolerance, regardless of the topic at hand. Thus, the simplest decision I have ever made was to choose categories for this post: Everything applies.

What is not abundantly clear to the world is that humankind is in the midst of an experiment to highlight the differences between the various strains of the human species through irrefutable and measurable facts, and the inconvenient conclusions are now surfacing and within grasp. Thus the rage.

A popular theme that elicits uncontrollable emotion followed by weaponized, yet blank-loaded finger pointing is immigration, and if one does not agree with the guilt inducing humanitarian approach of permanent open borders, eventually one will be called a racist, a bigot, a xenophobe or all of the above, potentially prefaced by a barrage of cuss words. To clarify, it’s not “migration” because, unlike birds, they don’t return to their countries in the summer.

For example, if the position against unhinged illegal immigration points out economically measurable concerns, the impact on society and welfare resources, not to mention the incoming intellectual ineptitude, the response will be that illegal aliens—excuse me, undocumented immigrants—have the right to seek asylum and the right to seek a better life. When that fails, because according to international law no country has the obligation to grant asylum to any human being, and no person has the legal right to demand asylum or invade a sovereign nation, the argument will shift and try to appeal to one’s emotion, including religious covenants.

But as logic prevents one from being swayed, the tactic, once again, is to rely on the effects of social stigma by labeling one a racist, bigot and xenophobe, among others, and then to seek a silencing mechanism so their alleged “truths” are not disturbed by the facts. Labeling theory dates back to the 1960s and states that human behavior may be influenced by the terms used to classify the individual. However, people are becoming increasingly immune to name-calling because they’ve realized that it’s a quick fire mechanism that is triggered when valid arguments are missing in action.

Invariably, the screamer’s position is flimsy and flawed at best, because the all-encompassing policies of unicornic goldilocks and planetary ever-after happiness are never free of economic consequences, and they cannot provide a logical, workable blueprint, regardless of the topic at hand—ever.

What is not so apparent is that the shouters live in a constant state of selfie moments, designed to elevate their egos by seeking adoration from those that they defend but actually view as socially and intellectually inferior. And there lies the reason why you’ll see the do-gooders feeding “refugees” at the border while surrounded by aiding and abetting media, and then hopping back on their SUVs and private planes when the tortillas run out. And please, whatever you-the-refugee do, do not follow them to their safe estates.

The next time someone accuses you of being a racist, bigot or xenophobe simply reply “Suuure. You were saying?”

But be ready for the immediate fallout, because when all else fails and the winnable argument is nowhere to be found, they will do a mind-boggling 257 degree turn on the subject at hand, and you will be called a bot—short for robot, but many don’t know it—or the now fashionable accusation of being a well compensated Russian agent only because everyone automatically belongs to a political group if one dares to question the unquestionable wisdom of pretentiously oppressed individuals. Da!

Stay tuned. More disclosure and discourse is on the way.

---