Every day, it appears, there’s yet another protest by the professional activists seeking ego boosting selfies while delivering holier-than-thou admonitions to Western Civilization regarding its disregard for their Climate Change Calamitous Claims.

Meanwhile, the same happy yellers avoid demonstrations of disapproval in Asia and Africa, the culprits in “Ocean Pollution Viewed Through A Clear Plastic Straw,” increasingly destroying the little credibility that the Climate Change agenda has left. Their media comrades have been hard at work, linking anything and everything to Climate Change, from habitual summer ice thawing to a shortage of shoe strings, a meager lupini bean harvest to whiter penguins.

As far as the science is concerned, the core deceptive elements and key unanswered questions have been exposed in “Climate Change, CO2 And You” and “What If Higher CO2 Emissions Are Saving The Earth?“

But if anyone thinks that CO2, temperature and sea levels are the issues, then the bamboozling has worked, because the core driver is completely unrelated to Earth’s well-being. It’s about people’s dismal welfare caused by the impossibility of racial equality in socio-techno-economic output.

Let’s bring the United Nations into the fold. “Historic UN Human Rights case opens door to climate change asylum claims” highlights the Robin Hoodwink to feed the inept.

GENEVA (21 January 2020) – In its first ruling on a complaint by an individual seeking asylum from the effects of climate change, the UN Human Rights Committee* has stated that countries may not deport individuals who face climate change-induced conditions that violate the right to life.

In 2015, Ioane Teitiota’s asylum application in New Zealand was denied, and he was deported with his wife and children to his home country of Kiribati. He filed a complaint to the UN Human Rights Committee, arguing that by deporting him, New Zealand had violated his right to life.

It’s pointless to dig deep into the merits of the case, and suffice it to say that New Zealand is not responsible for Mr. Teitiota’s ineptitude as a human being, as well as the shortcomings of his country. The logic applies to all asylum claims. Furthermore, the U.N. is a toothless nest of incompetence, and no country on Earth is legally obligated to grant asylum to anyone, for any reason, because it would violate a country’s sovereignty.

To add context to the asylum claim, Kiribati’s appeal as a tourism destination, not a conflict zone, is advertised by the Kiribati National Tourism Office.

The Islands of Kiribati lay claim to a number of the bloodiest battles that were fought out in World War II. Sixty years on and much of the evidence of these battles still remain available for travellers to view as a living museum of this part of history; in particular Tarawa, Butaritari and Abemama of the Gilbert group, and Banaba island.

Maybe Kiribati should let the Brits colonize it again, but then the complaint would surface about disruption of its extraordinary culture — you know, the usual meaningless gadgets, costumes and third grade choreography. To be fair, Kiribati has few natural resources, but so does Switzerland.

The U.N. paper titled “Climate Change and Social Inequality” provides the evidence of the issue’s underlying position.

This paper offers a unifying conceptual framework for understanding the relationship between climate change and “within-country inequalities,” referred here collectively as “social inequality.”

But the objective was truly spelled out in 2015 by Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change.

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.

Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: “This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”

But there’s yet another facet to this saga. The permanent and widespread incompetence of governments must be fed by increased taxation, and the future will see surcharges on all plastics, woods, and potato peels, in addition to taxes on excess windmill utilization when combustion engines become illegal. Why is marijuana now legal in some states? It’s about feeding government’s monetary addiction.

Yet the true polluters are Africa and Asia, where people are too intellectually deficient to comprehend the impact of their behavior, but must be protected from the truth. Obviously, they’re largely incapable of learning which was proven by colonization.

Climate Change is a Robin Hoodwink that couldn’t care less about solar flares or purple polar bears, and is designed to dip into your wallet while denying the fact that inequality is produced by inborn intellectual differentials. But anything will be done to prevent exposing “The Myth That All Men Are Created Equal.”

When Climate Change fails to persuade, Western Civilization will be on the financial hook for unsightly mountain formations, overly wet rivers, and volcanoes spewing excessively hot lava, because Caucasians are at fault for racial/ethnic ineptitude. And there’s a tax for that!

---